From jcowan@reutershealth.com Thu Dec 05 03:23:11 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 11:23:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 39447 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 11:23:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 11:23:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 11:23:11 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Ju62-0002QK-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:23:10 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ju5y-0002Q3-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:23:06 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:23:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from [65.246.141.151] (helo=mail2.reutershealth.com) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ju5t-0002Pr-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 03:23:01 -0800 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA02392; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 06:34:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200212051134.GAA02392@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 5 Dec 2002 06:19:33 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Official Statement- LLG Board approves new baseline policy To: phma@webjockey.net Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 06:19:33 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <0212050017190A.01986@neofelis> from "Pierre Abbat" at Dec 05, 2002 12:17:18 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 3063 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: John Cowan Reply-To: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan Pierre Abbat scripsit: > What I'd like to know is why there are two gismu for Anseriformes and two for > Galliformes, and none for Passeriformes, which is by far the most speciose > order of birds, or any other order. It's all about domestication. -- I suggest you call for help, John Cowan or learn the difficult art of mud-breathing. jcowan@reutershealth.com --Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan