Subject: [lojban] Re: More stuff

From: Invent Yourself <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:15:43 -0500 (EST)

On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Nick Nicholas wrote:

> 2. ka'enai
>
> My current position on ka'enai: we should not change it, because that
> exceeds our mandate, as it would cause a major grammar change.

Of course, the BF may in fact consider it, and I think that the debate
should be heard because I think both Jorge's and Jordan's points are worth
addressing, and should enter the minutes of the BF proceedings. It may
generate precedent.

-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.