From xod@thestonecutters.net Thu Dec 05 08:16:58 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 16:16:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 32405 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 16:16:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 16:16:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 16:16:57 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18JygL-0007Tt-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:16:57 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Jyfl-0007Tc-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:16:21 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:16:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Jyff-0007TP-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 08:16:16 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB5GFik76878 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:15:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 11:15:43 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: More stuff In-Reply-To: <12A8B59C-0868-11D7-9FC7-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> Message-ID: <20021205111319.U76559-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3076 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Nick Nicholas wrote: > 2. ka'enai > > My current position on ka'enai: we should not change it, because that > exceeds our mandate, as it would cause a major grammar change. Of course, the BF may in fact consider it, and I think that the debate should be heard because I think both Jorge's and Jordan's points are worth addressing, and should enter the minutes of the BF proceedings. It may generate precedent. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.