From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Dec 05 15:27:18 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 5 Dec 2002 23:27:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 75404 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2002 23:27:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Dec 2002 23:27:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2002 23:27:16 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18K5Om-0003Kd-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:27:16 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18K5OE-0003JW-00; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:26:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:26:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.39]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18K5O9-0003JN-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2002 15:26:37 -0800 Received: from macsrule.com (85.78.33.65.cfl.rr.com [65.33.78.85]) by smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gB5NQZTd006222 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:26:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:26:56 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Correction Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20021205082815.00acfec0@pop.east.cox.net> Message-Id: <0B2BDD8D-08A9-11D7-A3CE-00039362FD2A@macsrule.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) X-archive-position: 3093 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rmcivor@macsrule.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robert McIvor From: Robert McIvor Reply-To: rmcivor@macsrule.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Jeudi, déce 5, 2002, at 08:32 US/Eastern, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > At 06:00 PM 12/4/02 -0600, sbelknap wrote: >> About this poaching business I can only express mystification. I just >> don't >> get it. I generally favor transparency of intellectual capital. I see >> no >> reason why LLG should be unwilling to share their membership list >> with TLI. > > The primary reason would be privacy, and the keeping of commitment. > We have explicitly said that we will not sell our mailing list, and > therefore should not give it away either. TLI back in the 80s not > only did not make such a promise, they printed a list of member > addresses (and IIRC phone numbers) in Lognet on a periodic basis, and > in fact that was how I got the address list - from the editor of > LogNet because my initial intent was to put out a sort of unofficial > LogNet to try to get things moving again. In my previous letter, I wrote "illegally" when the actual accusation was "dishonesty"