Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan

From: "And Rosta" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 02:58:23 -0000

Bob McIvor:
> On Mercredi, déce 4, 2002, at 19:52 US/Eastern, And Rosta wrote:
>
> > Bob McIvor:
> >> Most newcomers to TLI have looked at both languages before deciding
> >> to go with TLI
> >
> > I'm curious as to what their reasons were. Do you know?
>
> One commonly expressed reason is the appearance of the written
> language. Another is the proliferation of cmavo
> whose semantics and usage, are constantly debated

Is this because fewer people are around to debate Loglan cmavo, or
because debate happens behind closed doors, or because the semantics
and usage of Loglan cmavo is more settled? If Loglan is more settled,
how was that achieved? And do you think that BF should consult
Loglan solutions for insights?

--And.