From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Dec 06 16:52:12 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 00:52:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 31483 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 00:52:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 00:52:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 00:52:12 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KTCW-0005Ly-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:52:12 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KTCT-0005Lf-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:52:09 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:52:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KTCO-0005LQ-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:52:04 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:52:04 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: More stuff Message-ID: <20021207005204.GB28980@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021206205731.GM28980@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3181 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 12:49:23AM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > > > OK, I'm going to stop defending And here, because I don't want > > > Robin whaling on my ass. :-) > > > > You are not defending the aspects of what he said that pissed me off > > > > In specific, I found his anger at the board offensive, given that > > the board was finally doing what everyone I've ever spoken to about > > the board has been asking for for years > > > > -Robin > > What's your beef? I think I just explained it. > That if the board does one very important thing right then it is > offensive to complain if it does another very important thing wrong? They are not seperate issues, is the problem. They are directly related, and I feel that it sent the wrong message to the board. > (Does that mean you won't be complaining when the board fails > to spend your donation within the time limit... ;) Probably not, actually. I don't see the point. I don't see that it would change anything. I don't see that your complaining did either. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi