From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Dec 06 16:59:59 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 00:59:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 66327 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 00:59:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 00:59:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 00:59:58 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KTK2-0005Zj-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:59:58 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KTJz-0005ZP-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:59:55 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:59:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KTJu-0005ZG-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:59:50 -0800 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 16:59:50 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti Message-ID: <20021207005950.GD28980@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021206195506.O85943-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021206195506.O85943-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3186 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:56:24PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > > > > Do you think so? Personally, I don't think I am capable of parsing > > the phonological string without the aid of pragmatics (i.e. knowing > > in advance what it is that you are likely to be saying). > > > I can assure you that pragmatics provides most of the understanding in > actual Lojban conversation. I would say 'context' rather than 'pragmatics', but I *strongly* agree with xod. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi