From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Dec 07 08:01:10 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 16:01:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 1859 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 16:01:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 16:01:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 16:01:10 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18KhO9-0004Ac-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:01:09 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18KhO0-0004AI-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:01:00 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:00:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18KhNv-0004A9-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 08:00:55 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB7G7DG9011447
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:07:13 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB7G7DUb011446
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:07:13 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 10:07:13 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] "2moi" crap (was Re: Aesthetics)
Message-ID: <20021207160713.GB11095@allusion.net>
References: <20021207071425.GA713@allusion.net> <20021207100045.A91480-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021207100045.A91480-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 3217
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:37:10AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Jordan DeLong wrote:
> > Also I can't *stand* crap like "2moi". I see it and read "two moi",
> > I can't read it remoi.
>=20
> That's just cause you haven't internalized the numbers yet. Rest assured,
> science and the accounting books in "Lojbanistan" are not done with two-
> and three-letter numerical cmavo.

Yes I have internalized the numbers; that's the problem. I've been
speaking english for many years.

> Using the cmavo, even though the CLL does it, is like the arbitrary
> English habit of spelling out numbers less than "fifteen", but using
> digits for numbers over 16. At some point, for numbers large enough to be
> unwieldy, even the most devoted cmavo-lover must break down and use
> digits. But at what threshold?

Note, however, that I mind things like "li 12312.0012" far less
than this "2moi" crap. The former is truely for what you
claim---shorting things when writing them because we're dealing
with long numbers. The latter is just lame; "re" is not harder to
write than "2", and it is *much* easier to read.

No one will ever need to write "12312.0012moi", so the long-number
argument is bogus when applied to it.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE98hywDrrilS51AZ8RAruBAKDPEsHKlHG7x1RG264Juwj5IL/+jACdEeBC
kcQAI73Bxp0jlMBeSuN0oJk=
=ufXe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6--

