Subject: [lojban] Re: "2moi" crap (was Re: Aesthetics)

From: John Cowan <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 11:59:52 -0500 (EST)

Jordan DeLong scripsit:

> No one will ever need to write "12312.0012moi", so the long-number
> argument is bogus when applied to it.

Not too clear; I find nothing strange in the idea of the 598moi page
of a book, or even the 598;22moi line of that book (viz. line 22 on
page 598). This is pronounced "musobipi'ereremoi", of course.

-- 
Híggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers John Cowan
Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is http://www.reutershealth.com
Unicode weenies and / François Yergeaus. [email-masked]