From lojbab@lojban.org Sat Dec 07 10:50:37 2002
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 18:50:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 49825 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 18:50:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 18:50:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao02.cox.net) (68.1.17.243)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 18:50:36 -0000
Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao02.cox.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP
  id <20021207185036.SHO2203.lakemtao02.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 13:50:36 -0500
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20021207133632.03a98140@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2002 13:43:55 -0500
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMOEAIHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021206223513.03a4fec0@pop.east.cox.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab

At 11:05 AM 12/7/02 +0000, And Rosta wrote:
>As you may have noticed, English doesn't
>have self-segmentation, yet you converse in it without problems with
>determining word boundaries.

I'm a native speaker. But people seem to have trouble learning 
English. And my limitations in learning Russian have been in part one of 
picking words out. Generally for me to understand Russian, I have to 
identify one or two common words in the speech stream and resolve from 
there. If there are no familiar words in the speech stream, I cannot 
resolve Russian into words. Fluent Spanish I cannot resolve at all even if 
I do occasionally recognize a word going by.

>As I said in messages of yesterday, I strongly suspect that with
>spoken Lojban, as with natural languages, we rely mainly on pragmatics
>rather than phonology to disambiguate word-boundaries. I acknowledge
>that I have had almost nil experience of hearing spoken Lojban
>while you have had a lot, so I may be wrong.

It should be easy to test. Have the random sentence generator generate 
something long and random but in theory grammatical. Get someone to read 
it fluently at varying speeds (a text-to-speech generator would be best to 
prevent speaker cuing of word boundaries, and see if it can be resolved by 
a listener.

lojbab

-- 
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org



