From ragnarok@pobox.com Sat Dec 07 13:43:42 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 21:43:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 38214 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 21:43:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 21:43:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 21:43:41 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.12] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id AB96934013C; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 16:43:50 -0500 To: Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Loglan Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 16:43:40 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20021207160941.03933aa0@pop.east.cox.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.12] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382 X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl >1. Arguments getting too heated (I opine that this drove pc away, though >it may also have been that he needed a break) I meant through statements like "so-and-so is not welcome" - seeing such things is troubling to me. >3. Many people, including Nowicki the Ygyde promoter in a recent >alt.language.artificial post, have indicated that we give the impression >that Lojbanists can't agree about anything. To those who want to see a Isn't that the "Lojban is a religion" guy, who signed up on the list despite having no interest in Lojban except as a feeding ground for Ygyde?