From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Sat Dec 07 18:22:34 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 02:22:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 7880 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 02:22:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 02:22:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 02:22:34 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18Kr5W-0003HP-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:22:34 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18Kr5S-0003H4-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:22:30 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.112])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18Kr5N-0003GX-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:22:25 -0800
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-58-82.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.58.82])
  by lmsmtp02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74ED5B863
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 03:21:53 +0100 (MET)
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Aesthetics
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 02:24:06 -0000
Message-ID: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMOECLHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <20021207155437.I91480-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Importance: Normal
X-archive-position: 3271
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811
X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin

xod:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Craig wrote:
> 
> > Because there is a greater phonic contrast between [T] and [f] or [s] than
> > between [h] and [x], to me 
> 
> This is like a Japanese person saying insisting that r and l sound alike 

They do sound similar! 

> Meanwhile, Kemitic has ', [x], and two distinct sounds BETWEEN them!

What is Kemitic, and where can I find info on its phonology?

--And.