From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Dec 07 18:32:10 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 02:32:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 17470 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 02:32:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 02:32:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 02:32:09 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18KrEn-0003R2-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:32:09 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18KrEj-0003Qe-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:32:05 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:32:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18KrEf-0003QV-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 18:32:01 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB82cHG9021765
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:38:22 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB82cGoT021764
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:38:16 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 20:38:16 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: typographical rudeness (was: RE: Re: Aesthetics
Message-ID: <20021208023816.GA21580@allusion.net>
References: <20021207071425.GA713@allusion.net> <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGECGHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMGECGHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 3274
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:19:06AM -0000, And Rosta wrote:
> Jordan:
[...]
> > Of rudeness though, nothing rivals using all capital letters (which
> > I've seen And do)=20
>=20
> Do you mean because all caps is shouting, or because of the idea
> that there is some fundamental incongruity between Lojban and
> all caps? If the former, then yes, but not all all caps is shouting
> -- e.g. headings are often all caps. And smallcaps aren't shouty.
> If the latter, then the idea is silly, and the putative rudeness
> reduces to the insufferable idea that mere nonconformity is rude.

a) CAPS FREAKING SUCK. (get it? (=3D=3D the shouting thing))
b) lojban looks even worse in all caps than english.
c) caps in lojban have a specific purpose: indicating stress. If
you capitalize everything you break this usage.[1]
d) sucks for AVI.

> BTW, I don't remember having used allcaps. Well, once, when we
> were discussing El Pueblo Unido, but that's a chant -- you're
> *supposed* to shout it loudly.

I was thinking of "MELBI COI".

[1] The ugliness of specifing stress using caps could probably be
prevented by using acute marks. For example something like
la DJUliet. becomes la dj=FAliet. In the case of multiple
vowel-letters in the slaka it goes on the first.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE98rCYDrrilS51AZ8RAl8jAKCwd6wtaj1mu0tsjK1fQUPObD6OkgCeI6YY
EJeWwPdBYgs79oQsjEca8A8=
=WrnB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--

