From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Dec 07 20:03:27 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 04:03:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 13194 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 04:03:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 04:03:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 04:03:27 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Ksf8-0004vF-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:03:26 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ksf4-0004ut-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:03:22 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ksey-0004uT-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:03:16 -0800 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.57] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A4907C4014A; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 23:03:28 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: typographical rudeness (was: RE: Re: Aesthetics Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:03:17 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <3DF2B4E5.3090300@bilkent.edu.tr> Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.57] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-archive-position: 3282 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: raganok@intrex.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: raganok@intrex.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out >> [1] The ugliness of specifing stress using caps could probably be >> prevented by using acute marks. For example something like >> la DJUliet. becomes la djúliet. In the case of multiple >> vowel-letters in the slaka it goes on the first. >Oh yes please! On occasions when we have to use ASCII, an underscore >would do, I suppose. I do this in my handwritten Lojban. Of course, my handwritten Lojban is quite a sight. I can't stop myself, when using the Roman alphabet, from using all the conventions that go with it, so I have decided to use another one; I write in Cyrillic. I also use rather unwieldy cmavo compounds, and my apostrophe has migrated downwards to be more like a dot between the vowels. I also have shorthand symbols for the dipthongs ai and au.