From phma@webjockey.net Sat Dec 07 20:29:05 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 04:29:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 29662 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 04:29:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 04:29:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 04:29:04 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Kt3w-0005PH-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:29:04 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Kt3q-0005Oy-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:28:58 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:28:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Kt3l-0005Of-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 20:28:53 -0800 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 51AF43C5D2; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:28:22 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: typographical rudeness (was: RE: Re: Aesthetics Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 23:28:20 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20021207071425.GA713@allusion.net> <20021208023816.GA21580@allusion.net> In-Reply-To: <20021208023816.GA21580@allusion.net> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02120723282005.19670@neofelis> X-archive-position: 3285 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Saturday 07 December 2002 21:38, Jordan DeLong wrote: li'o > [1] The ugliness of specifing stress using caps could probably be > prevented by using acute marks. For example something like > la DJUliet. becomes la djúliet. In the case of multiple > vowel-letters in the slaka it goes on the first. I think it should depend on whether it's a rising or falling diphthong. e.g. {ráumei strutióne} phma