From jcowan@reutershealth.com Sun Dec 08 05:59:41 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 13:59:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 29055 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 13:59:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 13:59:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 13:59:40 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA06607; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:12:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200212081412.JAA06607@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 8 Dec 2002 08:59:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [jboske] Re: [lojban] lo'edu'u To: jboske@yahoogroups.com Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 08:59:36 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20021207133051.03a98c00@pop.east.cox.net> from "Robert LeChevalier" at Dec 07, 2002 01:35:59 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan Robert LeChevalier scripsit: > The concept that what we say is unrelated to what we think (or how we think > for that matter) seems mind-bogglingly wrong, which is probably why SWH is > accepted by assumption by most people who presume that language structure > determines what we say. BTW, this week's edition of _New Scientist_ magazine has a cover article on neo-neo-Whorfianism, positioned as anti-Chomskyism. -- A poetical purist named Cowan [that's me: jcowan@reutershealth.com] Once put the rest of us dowan. [on xml-dev] "Your verse would be sweeter http://www.ccil.org/~cowan If it only had metre http://www.reutershealth.com And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan." [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay