From xod@thestonecutters.net Sun Dec 08 08:05:39 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 16:05:38 -0000
Received: (qmail 52871 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 16:05:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 16:05:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 16:05:38 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18L3w2-0001vE-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 08:05:38 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18L3vy-0001ur-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 08:05:34 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 08:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18L3vt-0001ug-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 08:05:29 -0800
Received: from localhost (xod@localhost)
  by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB8G50K95734
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 11:05:00 -0500 (EST)
  (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net)
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 11:05:00 -0500 (EST)
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Aesthetics
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMOECLHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20021208103136.V95494-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-archive-position: 3299
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>
Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215
X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple

On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote:

> xod:
> > On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, Craig wrote:
> >
> > > Because there is a greater phonic contrast between [T] and [f] or [s] than
> > > between [h] and [x], to me
> >
> > This is like a Japanese person saying insisting that r and l sound alike
>
> They do sound similar!
>
> > Meanwhile, Kemitic has ', [x], and two distinct sounds BETWEEN them!
>
> What is Kemitic, and where can I find info on its phonology?


Ancient Egyptian.

http://webperso.iut.univ-paris8.fr/~rosmord/Intro/node5.html#SECTION00032000000000000000

Now I had learned that {h} was h, {H} was an emphatic h, {x} was a raspy
[x], and {X} was a non-raspy [x]. I consider Lojban [x] to be raspy, to
broaden the distinction to ['].




-- 
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.





