From phma@webjockey.net Sun Dec 08 14:37:10 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 22:37:10 -0000
Received: (qmail 72565 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 22:37:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 22:37:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 22:37:09 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18LA2v-0006kz-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:37:09 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18LA2r-0006ke-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:37:05 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:37:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18LA2m-0006kL-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 14:37:00 -0800
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
  id 324AE3C477; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:36:28 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:36:26 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEDJHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMCEDJHBAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0212081736270A.19670@neofelis>
X-archive-position: 3309
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Sunday 08 December 2002 17:07, And Rosta wrote:
> pier:
> > The problem with section 16 is that it cannot be extended to fu'ivla
> > longer than 6 letters which end in CCVVCV, and is very difficult to
> > extend to longer fu'ivla of whatever form. I have a proposal that works
> > for a large class of fu'ivla, including both CCVVCV and all type-3's that
> > end in a single vowel, and have only to code it up and prove it
>
> Is your proposal on the wiki? Seeing as you are our main fuhivla wonk,
> I imagine that the BF would tend to look to you for 'expert opinion'
> in the first instance.

It's on the page [rafsi fu'ivla].

phma




