Subject: [lojban] Re: [h] (was: RE: Re: Aesthetics

From: "Craig" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 17:52:08 -0500

>> >In other words, the problem is not only that [h] and [x] are rather
>> >similar in isolation,

>Umm, what?

>We *are* talking about lojban ' and x, right?

It isn't nice to assume that lojbaN ' is the same as ipa [h] - remember,
this is not normative (though it is normal) and the CLL explicitly mentions
[T] as an acceptable pronunciation. Some of us see "lojbaN '" and
immediately think [T].