From xod@thestonecutters.net Sun Dec 08 15:25:31 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 8 Dec 2002 23:25:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 2993 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2002 23:25:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 8 Dec 2002 23:25:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 8 Dec 2002 23:25:31 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LAni-0007k8-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:25:30 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LAng-0007jp-00; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:25:28 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:25:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LAnb-0007jH-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 08 Dec 2002 15:25:23 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB8NOsU97223 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:24:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:24:54 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ihi vs. ixi In-Reply-To: <150.1875cb1a.2b252d80@aol.com> Message-ID: <20021208182340.B95494-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3323 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 BestATN@aol.com wrote: > i didn't believe that "ihi is so incredibly hard to articulate", but i tried > saying the two (ihi, ixi), and sure enough, when i say 'ihi', it sounds > (almost) like 'ixi'. i'm not sure i can tell them apart all the time Try a thick [x] like you're hocking a fat loogie and get back to us. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.