From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 09 12:31:51 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 9 Dec 2002 20:31:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 50230 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 20:31:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2002 20:31:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 20:31:51 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUZD-0006oA-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:31:51 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LUZ7-0006nm-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:31:45 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUZ1-0006nX-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:31:39 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:31:39 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: name of the language Message-ID: <20021209203139.GT6170@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021209144235.03bab1d0@pop.east.cox.net> <62D2FB43-0BB4-11D7-BDFB-000393629ED4@uic.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <62D2FB43-0BB4-11D7-BDFB-000393629ED4@uic.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3347 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:25:41PM -0600, Steven Belknap wrote: > For those concerned about "poaching," check out the html code for > Loglan.org and lojban.org. Note that the content meta tags for > lojban.org do not mention Loglan, while those for Loglan.org do > mention lojban! The purpose of the meta content tag is to help people > find us with google and other search engines. There is absolutely > nothing wrong with putting "Loglan" in the content list for > lojban.org. I guess that is why lojban gets no higher than 13th on > google, while the first 12 hits are all Loglan sites. > > Um, Robin? I think that loglan.org mentioning lojban is *highly* innappropriate, as the reverse would be for us. I will bow to the boards' will in this, however. And, btw, I have no idea what search *you* are running on google, but the first few hits *I* get when I enter 'lojban' into google, in order, are: http://www.lojban.org/ http://xiron.pc.helsinki.fi/lojban/ http://nuzban.wiw.org/wiki/ http://neptune.spaceports.com/~words/lojban.html http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/ http://g.webring.com/hub?ring=lojban -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi