From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 09 12:40:39 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 9 Dec 2002 20:40:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 52302 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 20:40:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2002 20:40:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 20:40:38 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUhi-0007Iv-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:40:38 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LUhf-0007Ic-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:40:35 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUha-0007IR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:40:30 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:40:30 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: name of the language Message-ID: <20021209204030.GV6170@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021209203139.GT6170@digitalkingdom.org> <20021209153442.Y609-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021209153442.Y609-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3350 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:35:54PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I think that loglan.org mentioning lojban is *highly* > > innappropriate, as the reverse would be for us. > > A US court decided that the reverse would be completely appropriate > for us. Umm, can you explain that comment? I didn't mean legally appropriate, btw. I meant socially innappropriate, i.e. rude. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi