From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 09 17:05:40 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 10 Dec 2002 01:05:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 79025 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 01:05:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Dec 2002 01:05:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 01:05:39 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LYqB-0004T4-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:05:39 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LYq6-0004Sl-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:05:34 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:05:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com ([65.32.1.34]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LYq1-0004Sc-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:05:29 -0800 Received: from macsrule.com (85.78.33.65.cfl.rr.com [65.33.78.85]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id gBA15Rdt025502 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:05:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 20:06:08 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: name of the language Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis In-Reply-To: <20021209203139.GT6170@digitalkingdom.org> Message-Id: <910548E2-0BDB-11D7-A080-00039362FD2A@macsrule.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548) X-archive-position: 3365 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rmcivor@macsrule.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robert McIvor From: Robert McIvor Reply-To: rmcivor@macsrule.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Lundi, déce 9, 2002, at 15:31 US/Eastern, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 02:25:41PM -0600, Steven Belknap wrote: >> For those concerned about "poaching," check out the html code for >> Loglan.org and lojban.org. Note that the content meta tags for >> lojban.org do not mention Loglan, while those for Loglan.org do >> mention lojban! The purpose of the meta content tag is to help people >> find us with google and other search engines. There is absolutely >> nothing wrong with putting "Loglan" in the content list for >> lojban.org. I guess that is why lojban gets no higher than 13th on >> google, while the first 12 hits are all Loglan sites. >> >> Um, Robin? > > I think that loglan.org mentioning lojban is *highly* innappropriate, > as > the reverse would be for us. I will bow to the boards' will in this, > however. > I wonder why you think it inappropriate, let alone "highly" inappropriate. Incidentally, JCB never complained about the reference to Lojban on our page.