From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 09 18:35:20 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 10 Dec 2002 02:35:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 66588 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 02:35:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Dec 2002 02:35:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 02:35:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LaEy-0006Hp-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:35:20 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LaEr-0006HV-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:35:13 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:35:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LaEm-0006HM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 18:35:08 -0800 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.38] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A2FC34600C4; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 21:35:40 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: My next suggestion Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 21:35:11 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <3E053088@webmail.uic.edu> Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.38] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-archive-position: 3375 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: raganok@intrex.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: raganok@intrex.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out >4. There is no downside if we have some content for these conlangs, such as >word lists which translate selected LLG Loglan words into these other >languages. (First principle of proper keyword selection: there should be >actual content directly relevant to a keyword at the site.) "stuffing the content of the web pages with the keywords" >My proposal: the ten most popular conlangs should be mentioned on the LLG I decline to deal with the multiple problems of this plan. However, one quick quetion: Which ten? Many top-ten lists get silly, and include things with no actual speakers, such as Nadsat. >Hasn't anybody here read the cluetrain manifesto? http://www.cluetrain.org/ So just because you have a pseudocool name for yourself you are an authority?