From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Dec 10 07:05:30 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 10 Dec 2002 15:05:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 36213 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 15:05:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Dec 2002 15:05:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 15:05:27 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Llwt-0005TD-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 07:05:27 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Llwr-0005Si-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 07:05:25 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 07:05:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [65.246.141.151] (helo=mail2.reutershealth.com) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Llwe-0005PY-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 07:05:12 -0800 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA29684; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:16:32 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200212101516.KAA29684@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:04:02 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: More stuff To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:04:02 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20021208231452.GA26904@digitalkingdom.org> from "Robin Lee Powell" at Dec 08, 2002 03:14:52 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 3397 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: John Cowan Reply-To: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > If you can convince me that garti/karti is worse that kalci/kelci, I'l > be very impressed. Garti and karti differ in only one feature (voice), whereas kalci/kelci differ in at least three features (low vs. mid, tense vs. lax, central vs. front), at least in the canonical pronunciation. -- Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML John Cowan Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker jcowan@reutershealth.com saying "No information items inside". http://www.reutershealth.com --Eve Maler http://www.ccil.org/~cowan