From xod@thestonecutters.net Tue Dec 10 14:40:04 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 10 Dec 2002 22:40:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 32347 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 22:40:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Dec 2002 22:40:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 22:40:04 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Lt2q-0006hu-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:40:04 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Lt2i-0006hU-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:39:56 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Lt2c-0006hH-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:39:50 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBAMdIx09943 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:39:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 17:39:18 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: tags In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021210173824.P8691-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3426 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple An eloquent construction that I'm sure many wives believe fully, zo'o. On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > These meta tag thingies must be why Google finds me porn even > when I haven't asked it to. I had been wondering why when, say, > I search for "phenomenology" I get offered "Hot Anal Teens!" > which points to a web page apparently innocent of all knowledge > of schools of philosophical thought. Evidently these meta tag > thingies are employed, by the minions of the mafiosi that > apparently run most of the web, in a way contrived to deceive > search engines. > > --And. > > -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.