From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Dec 10 16:40:34 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 11 Dec 2002 00:40:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 96942 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 00:40:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Dec 2002 00:40:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 00:40:34 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18LuvS-0008PZ-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:40:34 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18LuvM-0008P6-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:40:28 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18LuvG-0008Ox-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:40:23 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gBB0kxG9050182
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 18:46:59 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gBB0kxAp050181
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 18:46:59 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 18:46:59 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: tags
Message-ID: <20021211004659.GA49678@allusion.net>
References: <C9A98F2128EDD411B0920008C7B337A13DCFE1@hamsem01.de.gedas.vwg> <04C811D2-0C50-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu> <20021210100015.7e4f8f84.rizen@surreality.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021210100015.7e4f8f84.rizen@surreality.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 3430
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:00:15AM -0800, Theodore Reed wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 08:59:44 -0600
> Steven Belknap <sbelknap@uic.edu> wrote:
>=20
> > That was the best I could come up with. Perhaps it would be better to=20
> > have the title as:
> >=20
> > lojban lo lojbo bangu (Loglan: The Logical Language)
>=20
> Is it just me or does "lojban lo lojbo bangu" strike anyone else as
> unlojbanic? It seems like it is a horrible malglico translation. Why not
> "la lojban no'u le logji bangu"? (Note that I use logji, not lojbo. )=20

Yup. And the "le" instead of "lo".

[...]
> xu le prenu poi na du mi jinvi le du'u zoi my. lojban lo lojbo bangu
> .my. na'e lojbo .i zoi my. lojban lo lojbo bangu my. simlu le za'i
> tcexlali malglico fanva .i mu'i ma na cusku lu la lojban no'u le logji
> bangu li'u .i ko djuno le du'u mi cusku zo logji jenai zo lojbo
[...]

.ie .iji'a zo le basti zo lo cu dranymau

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD4DBQE99osDDrrilS51AZ8RAtyzAKClv5e0nd1qczx3yRA5ibX4QoxFpACXf0pC
Q5EnYlyJ3C3VCsWuV3tLow==
=ZLow
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--

