From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Dec 10 19:22:49 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 11 Dec 2002 03:22:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 86357 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 03:22:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Dec 2002 03:22:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 03:22:49 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LxSS-0002fl-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:22:48 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LxRJ-0002eR-00; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:21:37 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LxPg-0002cc-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:19:56 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gBB3QXG9051302 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:26:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gBB3QX42051301 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:26:33 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:26:33 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: tags Message-ID: <20021211032632.GA51270@allusion.net> References: <20021211004659.GA49678@allusion.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 3434 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:53:11PM -0500, Craig wrote: > >> Is it just me or does "lojban lo lojbo bangu" strike anyone else as > >> unlojbanic? It seems like it is a horrible malglico translation. Why n= ot > >> "la lojban no'u le logji bangu"? (Note that I use logji, not lojbo. ) >=20 > >Yup. And the "le" instead of "lo". >=20 > "no'u le" should probably become "noi" - "la lojban noi logji bangu" - si= nce > the le essentially undoes the demi-du of the no'u. This is part of why I > feel most po'u constructions are to'e lobykai, but I don't feel like gett= ing > into that flamewar again. "lobykai" is toljbo. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE99rBoDrrilS51AZ8RAo3YAJ0aZpHMKNBYiBjDWHSLIvbYWxlDRgCgrf1K ZtIZPeEsaXiUw6B8JILB41M= =DVcp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--