From araizen@newmail.net Wed Dec 11 09:13:39 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 11 Dec 2002 17:13:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 62744 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 17:13:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Dec 2002 17:13:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 17:13:38 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18MAQU-0000Sn-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:13:38 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18MAQN-0000SH-00; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:13:31 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:13:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.30] ident=exim) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18MAQH-0000Rz-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:13:26 -0800 Received: from xil-26.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.181.26] helo=newmail.net ident=araizen) by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 18MAQD-000KAa-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:13:21 +0200 Message-ID: <3DF77231.2080802@newmail.net> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:13:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: html tag ethics References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-archive-position: 3452 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: araizen@newmail.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Adam Raizen Reply-To: araizen@newmail.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=3063669 X-Yahoo-Profile: araizen la stivn. cusku di'e > I believe that "LLG Loglan" is clearly distinct from > "TLI Loglan" If I prefer to use this term and my readers or listeners > understand me, what harm is done? I believe that "gubblick" is clearly distinct from "phrase". If I prefer to use this term and my readers or listeners understand me, what harm is done? mu'o mi'e .adam.