From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Thu Dec 12 06:08:54 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 12 Dec 2002 14:08:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 87902 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2002 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Dec 2002 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2002 14:08:52 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18MU1E-0001Db-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:08:52 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18MU14-0001DC-00; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:08:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lmout02.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.121]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18MU0z-0001D1-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:08:37 -0800 Received: from lycos.co.uk (lmcodec02.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.56]) by lmout02.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 864AFFE63; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:08:05 +0100 (MET) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Message-ID: <1039702042024396@lycos-europe.com> X-Mailer: LycosMail Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] bridling hostility (was: RE: Re: the ethics of the HTML content meta tag Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:07:22 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=_NextPart_Lycos_0243961039702042_ID" X-archive-position: 3478 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: And Rosta Reply-To: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Originating-IP: [193.61.255.22] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=122260811 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin --=_NextPart_Lycos_0243961039702042_ID Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Jordan:
>I don't think *anyone* has supported your "'Loglan' is the english
>word for 'lojban'" crap (excepting you).
>
>Anyway; if you really want to abuse meta tags so badly, how about
>you put up your own lojban site? No one is stopping you...

Steven is advocating what he thinks is best for Lojban, and best for official
LLG policy, not what he thinks is best for him. He is clearly not speaking
out of a yen to abuse meta tags. The list would be a happier place if you
respected that his intentions are honourable, and replied simply that
"your idea has been considered inappropriate for the following reasons...
and this is why it hasn't won support".

I have a sense that the atmosphere of the list is a little less collegial
than it used to be, and that insults and adhominems are becoming more
common.

--And.

When words aren't enough - Vodafone live! A new world of colour, sounds, picture messages and information on you r mobile. Click here to find out more.

--=_NextPart_Lycos_0243961039702042_ID--