From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Dec 12 15:12:09 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 12 Dec 2002 23:12:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 52357 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2002 23:12:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Dec 2002 23:12:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2002 23:12:08 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18McUy-0005DD-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:12:08 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18McUq-0005Cr-00; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:12:00 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:11:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18McUl-0005Ci-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:11:55 -0800 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 15:11:55 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: the ethics of the HTML content meta tag Message-ID: <20021212231155.GX24883@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021212051327.03408490@pop.east.cox.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20021212164626.0335f0f0@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20021212164626.0335f0f0@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3518 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 05:12:39PM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > At 11:18 AM 12/12/02 -0600, Steven Belknap wrote: > >The relationship between TLI and LLG should not have been delegated > >to the webmaster and his assistants. > > It hasn't been. The relationship between TLI and LLG is being dealt > with by me (in consultation with the Board). However, since the > design of our respective web sites has not been an issue between us, > there was no policy issue to decide regarding the web site. If Robin > were to put up something that violated our policy, I would ask him to > change it; I doubt that this would be a problem. Again, I suddenly have this sudden urge to replace the logos on the main site with little pictures of penises or something. AFAIK, the LLG has no policy WRT pornography. 8) -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi