From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Dec 13 17:01:49 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Dec 2002 01:01:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 53641 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2002 01:01:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Dec 2002 01:01:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2002 01:01:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18N0ge-0001TG-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:01:48 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18N0gZ-0001Sw-00; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:01:43 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18N0gT-0001Sm-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 17:01:37 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gBE18QG9078398 for ; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:08:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gBE18Qrx078397 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:08:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 19:08:26 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Word resolution algorithm so far Message-ID: <20021214010826.GA78020@allusion.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 3543 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:40:30PM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote: >=20 > la kreig cusku di'e >=20 > >I don't want to rehash this on the list, but: > > > >How would you lojbanize "Timothy"? "timotis" is clearly wrong - [T] is n= ot=20 > >a > >stop, and it is possible to use "timo'is", which can be pronounced with = the > >correct fricative. >=20 > I would lojbanize it as "timotis". A lojban name is not [...] Why not "timosis"? s sounds closer to th than t. --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9+oSKDrrilS51AZ8RAm47AJ4sBCUskBJRMs+vaNmjDeaefAkzXgCg0MG/ Vo3nfdCV2GcsLwDuPz0pBok= =8xCK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO--