From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Dec 14 03:52:29 2002
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 14 Dec 2002 11:52:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 99980 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2002 11:52:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Dec 2002 11:52:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2002 11:52:28 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18NAqK-0007Xp-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:52:28 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18NAqC-0007XT-00; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:52:20 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:52:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr ([139.179.30.24])
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18NAq7-0007XI-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 03:52:15 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AF228433
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:51:39 +0200 (EET)
Received: from bilkent.edu.tr (neo.fen.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.97.69])
  by manyas.bcc.bilkent.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AAC283B5
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:51:38 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <3DFB1AA0.5000004@bilkent.edu.tr>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 13:48:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Word resolution algorithm so far
References: <F258L31vHu62pELBUoi00001da5@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020531
X-archive-position: 3546
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: robin <robin@bilkent.edu.tr>
From: robin <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: robin@bilkent.edu.tr
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

Jorge Llambias wrote:
> Lee Daniel Crocker:
> 
>>But then we couldn't transliterate a Texas accent, where "yu"
>>is the standard pronunciation of "o", or parts of New York
>>where "yi" is the local version of "oi".
> 
> 
> No, but we are not supposed to be able to transliterate
> every accent of every language into Lojban.
> 
> Craig:
> 
>>I pronounce "maiky'elsem" as [majk@helsem] because that's how it was
>>intended to be said. Similarly, Hawai'ian has [r] and [l] as free 
>>allophones
>>of /l/, though most people use [l]. Yet in borrowed words, you hear more r
>>sounds when that fits the original sound, such as [?arani] for /'alani/
>>"orange".
> 
> 
> If that is the case, then /r/ and /l/ are on their way to not
> being free allophones anymore. I wouldn't expect the various
> pronunciations of "'" to be realized by the same speaker, and
> certainly not in fixed selected words. That would make them
> different phonemes for that speaker, wouldn't it?
> 
> Jordan DeLong:
> 
>>Why not "timosis"? s sounds closer to th than t.
> 
> 
> That's certainly possible. My preference is simply because
> that's what Spanish would do (compare with Spanish "Timoteo"),
> but "timosis" works in Lojban too.
> 

I'd go for "tim."!

mu'o mi'e solri.


-- 
"You almost never hear that word "computer" anymore, do you?
They're part of everything now. They used to be boxes with
keyboards, you know." - Tad Williams

Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Üniversitesi
Ankara
Turkey

http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin





