From jcowan@reutershealth.com Tue Dec 17 07:30:05 2002
Return-Path: <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 17 Dec 2002 15:30:05 -0000
Received: (qmail 18271 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2002 15:30:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Dec 2002 15:30:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Dec 2002 15:30:02 -0000
Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21])
  by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA23301;
  Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:42:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200212171542.KAA23301@mail2.reutershealth.com>
Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:29:37 -0500
Subject: Re: [lojban] Alphabet (was Re: More stuff)
To: opoudjis@optushome.com.au (Nick Nicholas)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:29:37 -0500 (EST)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: <8DBF55A5-0D11-11D7-8AA3-003065D4EC72@optushome.com.au> from "Nick Nicholas" at Dec 12, 2002 01:05:07 AM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456
X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan

Nick Nicholas scripsit:

> (This is why lots of people don't like them --- primarily the Japanese 
> and Chinese, since they conflate their ideograms.) 

Rather: Most of the people who don't like Unicode are Japanese or Chinese.
Unicode has had enthusiastic participation from many Chinese and Japanese
persons *and* official representatives of the various governments involved
(China, Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore) since day one.

> What I do object to is 
> the liberty in ordering the component letters in tei...foi; 

I wanted to preserve both the Unicode ordering and the dead-key ordering
as equally natural.

-- 
With techies, I've generally found John Cowan
If your arguments lose the first round http://www.reutershealth.com
Make it rhyme, make it scan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Then you generally can jcowan@reutershealth.com
Make the same stupid point seem profound! --Jonathan Robie

