From phma@webjockey.net Tue Dec 17 19:18:47 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 18 Dec 2002 03:18:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 54107 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 03:18:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Dec 2002 03:18:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 03:18:46 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18OUjN-0001RY-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:18:45 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18OUiT-0001RB-00; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:17:49 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:17:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=neofelis.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18OUhZ-0001Qi-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:16:53 -0800 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id CA5833C478; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:16:17 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: bridling hostility (was: RE: Re: the ethics of the HTML content meta tag Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:16:14 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <1039702042024396@lycos-europe.com> <3DF8A82A.5060907@bilkent.edu.tr> In-Reply-To: <3DF8A82A.5060907@bilkent.edu.tr> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0212172216141B.03697@neofelis> X-archive-position: 3585 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Thursday 12 December 2002 10:15, Robin Turner wrote: > It was pretty vituperous about six years ago, if I remember rightly. > There were just fewer people around to vituperate, and the vituperations > tended to be about more obscure issues. > > I agree that a little more politeness is in order. Perhaps we could > agree that all insulting messages should be posted in Lojban. If > nothing else it would be more amusing: > > le do mamta cu nalrebysmacu .ije le do patfu se steci le panci pei jbari > .i mi carna gi'e sputu fo do > > (sorry, I'm not up to coining a lujvo/fu'ivla for "elderberry" at the > moment, nor to rendering "in your general direction") sambuku mu'omi'e pier.