From jjllambias@hotmail.com Wed Dec 18 05:11:08 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 18 Dec 2002 13:11:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 32188 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2002 13:11:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Dec 2002 13:11:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.169) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2002 13:11:07 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 05:11:07 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:11:06 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: bridling hostility (was: RE: Re: the ethics of the HTML Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:11:06 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2002 13:11:07.0244 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED1162C0:01C2A696] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la djan cusku di'e > > (sorry, I'm not up to coining a lujvo/fu'ivla for "elderberry" at the > > moment, nor to rendering "in your general direction") > >lo'i do rorci cu bruna simxu > >A favorite insult of mine, which takes time to penetrate the mind of the >victim. Did you mean {tunba} instead of {bruna}, or is it more insulting if the procreators are mutually brothers? One of my father's sisters is married to one of my mother's brothers, and they have a daughter. If you said to me and my cousin "lo'i do rorci cu tunba simxu" I would not feel insulted, as you could be correct, depending on how strictly the details of the cross-relationships in {simxu} are supposed to work. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail