From jcowan@reutershealth.com Fri Dec 20 11:13:28 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 20 Dec 2002 19:13:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 89451 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2002 19:13:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Dec 2002 19:13:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Dec 2002 19:13:28 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com (IDENT:cowan@[10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA08729; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:25:55 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200212201925.OAA08729@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:14:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [lojban] Lojban gender (was: RE: [conculture] Re: Temples in Louisianne To: jjllambias@hotmail.com (Jorge Llambias) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:14:13 -0500 (EST) Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com In-Reply-To: from "Jorge Llambias" at Dec 20, 2002 06:49:57 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan Jorge Llambias scripsit: > Is that an official rule? I hesitate between {xycy} and {cy} > for {le xunre cukta}, but I think I never use {xy}. I never > know what to do about {le se broda}, so I end up changing > it to {le selbroda} so as to use {sy}. I might have used > {syby} sometime, too. {le mi broda} is definitely {by}, isn't > it? I also have doubts with {le nu broda}, but it has to be > {ny}. It's a plausible interpretation of what CLL says, anyway. I myself favor flexibility above glork-free-ness on this point. -- John Cowan jcowan@reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com "Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U." --K.X.U.