From phma@webjockey.net Sat Dec 21 19:33:00 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 33382 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8C18E3C478; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:32:57 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Lemma and conjecture Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:32:52 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0212212232520P.17068@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Saturday 21 December 2002 22:01, Jorge Llambias wrote: > I don't undesrstand what you mean by S3 being related to S1. I mean that S3 is obtained from S1, or vice versa, by some simple string operation such as removing the first syllaboid or adding {pa} to the beginning. > Maybe I misunderstood the conjecture. What I understood is that > if you have two lerpoi that have the same pattern of vowels, > consonants and clusters, then either the two are valid brivla > or the two are invalid brivla. Isn't that the conjecture? That > is what I showed to be true. You showed that to be true for lerpoi beginning CVV. There are still CVC and CCV to consider. Is it possible for S1 to be a tosmabru of S3, while S4 is a slinku'i of S2? phma