From phma@webjockey.net Sat Dec 21 20:37:15 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86107 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 459933C478; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:37:14 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] Lemma and conjecture Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:37:09 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0212212337090Q.17068@neofelis> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com From: Pierre Abbat X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 On Saturday 21 December 2002 22:42, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la pier cusku di'e > >Is it possible for S1 to be a tosmabru of S3, while S4 is a > >slinku'i of S2? > > S1 was the lujvo beginning with CVVRC, so it can't be a > tosmabru of anything. S2 was a corresponding fu'ivla > beginning with CVVKC, which can't be a slinku'i. You have completely missed my point. S1 and S2 begin CVCC, and S3 and S4 are the same words minus the initial CV. If S1, S2, and S3 are, ignoring the tosmabru test, lujvo, while S4 is not, then S2 is valid but S1 is not. phma