Subject: Re: [lojban] Bug in word break algorithm

From: Pierre Abbat <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 22:03:27 -0500

On Monday 06 January 2003 15:24, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> Right, I should have said: "any nonlujvo form starting with a
> permissible initial cluster such that if you remove the
> initial consonant you are left with a lujvo, a gismu or a
> 3-letter rafsi".

Still not quite right. You can run into hyphen-letters. {sro'ire'o} is a 
slinku'i though {ro'ire'o} is not a lujvo, and {sro'inre'o} is a valid 
fu'ivla though {ro'inre'o} is a lujvo.

phma