From jjllambias@hotmail.com Tue Jan 07 05:14:21 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Jan 2003 13:14:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 69840 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2003 13:14:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jan 2003 13:14:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.55) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2003 13:14:21 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 05:14:20 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:14:20 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Bug in word break algorithm Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:14:20 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2003 13:14:20.0987 (UTC) FILETIME=[B0CF38B0:01C2B64E] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la pier cusku di'e > > Right, I should have said: "any nonlujvo form starting with a > > permissible initial cluster such that if you remove the > > initial consonant you are left with a lujvo, a gismu or a > > 3-letter rafsi". > >Still not quite right. You can run into hyphen-letters. {sro'ire'o} is a >slinku'i though {ro'ire'o} is not a lujvo, and {sro'inre'o} is a valid >fu'ivla though {ro'inre'o} is a lujvo. Ouch! Let's try it again: "any nonlujvo form starting with a permissible initial cluster such that if you remove the initial consonant you are left with a gismu, or a sequence of one or more 3-letter rafsi possibly followed by a gismu". But if you can recognize any lujvo, why not just add CV in front of the form and test whether or not it became a lujvo? mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus