From jjllambias@hotmail.com Fri Jan 17 10:00:10 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 17 Jan 2003 18:00:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 88601 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 18:00:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2003 18:00:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.127) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 18:00:08 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:00:08 -0800 Received: from 200.49.74.2 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:00:07 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Some comments on the FAQ Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:00:07 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2003 18:00:08.0308 (UTC) FILETIME=[458A4340:01C2BE52] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.49.74.2] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 la camgusmis cusku di'e > > -- {re > > spageti} can only be {re spaGEti} and not {RE spaGEti} (though it > > could be {RE. spaGEti}). > >Hmm... OK, that's probably better, but is it official? Yes. cmavo can't be stressed directly in front of a brivla. This is not just for fu'ivla, this is how we can tell {tatruRALju} = {TA.truRALju} = {ta truralju} apart from {TAtruRALju} = {tatru ralju} for example. > > Not sure whether there are any other good "quintessential > > examples", as the FAQ calls it, of fu'ivla.) > >unikorna? That's {.u ni korna} (ungrammatical). {unkorna} would be a valid fu'ivla. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail