From phma@webjockey.net Fri Jan 17 10:55:40 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 17 Jan 2003 18:55:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 6060 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 18:55:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2003 18:55:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 18:55:27 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18Zbdz-0000kA-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:55:07 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18ZbYr-0000iC-00; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:49 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18ZbYe-0000he-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:49:38 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
  id D3CED493D; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:48:42 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Some comments on the FAQ
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:48:42 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <C9A98F2128EDD411B0920008C7B337A13DD06A@hamsem01.de.gedas.vwg>
In-Reply-To: <C9A98F2128EDD411B0920008C7B337A13DD06A@hamsem01.de.gedas.vwg>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200301171348.42580.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 3817
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Friday 17 January 2003 08:46, Newton, Philip wrote:
> So I'm not sure that the example is that good. (I don't have a better one,
> however. {pitsa} would be even worse since it's a valid gismu form. Not
> sure whether there are any other good "quintessential examples", as the FAQ
> calls it, of fu'ivla.)

I'm not sure what "quintessential example" means, but there are lots of 
fu'ivla, and a couple of lujvo made of fu'ivla, in the taxonomy chart 
(http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/Taxonomy).

phma




