From lojbab@lojban.org Fri Jan 17 12:10:25 2003
Return-Path: <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 96035 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 17 Jan 2003 20:10:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao02.cox.net) (68.1.17.243)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2003 20:10:24 -0000
Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao02.cox.net
  (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP
  id <20030117201024.WEL6744.lakemtao02.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org>
  for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:10:24 -0500
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030117150301.03398090@pop.east.cox.net>
X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:07:23 -0500
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Some comments on the FAQ
In-Reply-To: <F94Enr0FJBAFTdNOxak00000142@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab

At 02:17 PM 1/17/03 +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> >And vlatai claims that {spageti} is a valid stage-4 fu'ivla (while not
> >recognising {djarspageti} as type-3 lujvo with short rafsi).
>
>{djarspageti} is NOT a type-3 fu'ivla. Only consonant ending
>rafsi can be used in type-3.

That is NOT what CLL says, and it uses djarspageti as an example.

>{djarspageti} happens to be a
>valid fu'ivla, but for example {djarpitsa} is not (it fails
>slinku'i).

Could you explain how it fails slinku'i?

lojbab

-- 
lojbab lojbab@lojban.org
Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc.
2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org



