From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 19 08:02:51 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Jan 2003 16:02:51 -0000
Received: (qmail 9966 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2003 16:02:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Jan 2003 16:02:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2003 16:02:51 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18aHuN-0008FW-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:02:51 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18aHuI-0008FD-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:02:46 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18aHuD-0008F4-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 08:02:41 -0800
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h0JGB1fp080604
  for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 10:11:01 -0600 (CST)
  (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
  by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id h0JGB1xk080603
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 10:11:01 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 10:11:01 -0600
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e
Message-ID: <20030119161101.GA80469@allusion.net>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0301191320540.21590-100000@vinland.freeshell.org> <200301191529.KAA21247@mail2.reutershealth.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200301191529.KAA21247@mail2.reutershealth.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 3832
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:16:39AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Martin Bays scripsit:
>=20
> Excellent questions every one!
>=20
> > Is a jek-connected tanru like {ricfu je ninmu} still a single selbri? =
And
> > in that case, what is its place structure, given that {ricfu} and {ninm=
u}
> > have quite different place structures?
>=20
> The place structure is basically that of ninmu, but any sumti appearing
> before the selbri are put into the appropriate places of both ricfu and
> ninmu.

What? No.

(Are you confusing "co" conversion with tanru connectives?)

> > What's the difference between {LE broda pe BAI LE brode} and {LE broda=
be
> > BAI LE brode}?
>=20
> Little or nothing.

Nothing. Except you can use the "pe" one even if you're dealing
with a sumti like "la djan.", so it's superior in that respect.

[...]
> > How to use functions with ranges beyond the numbers? E.g. if I have a
> > function f:A->B with A and B sets {fy fancu abu noi selcmi ku'o by noi
> > selcmi}, what's f(x)? According to jbofi'e, {ma'o fy boi xy} and {le ma=
'o
> > fy boi xy} are both ungrammatical, and does {li ma'o fy boi xy} make
> > sense?
>=20
> "li" is correct. The gloss "the number" is really too narrow; it should =
be
> "the mathematical value".
>=20
> > Are there exact rules for how overriding components of a pro-bridi wor=
ks?
> > e.g. in {da zo'u remna .i naku go'i} is the second sentence equivalent =
to
> > {naku da zo'u remna} or {da zo'u naku remna}?
[...]

I think the latter. You'd need to say "na go'i" or "naku zo'u go'i"
(which are both the same thing) to get the former.

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+Ks4UDrrilS51AZ8RArjAAKCg7WFckBSVDCFVx42+D2WKSaZ3nQCgiKE9
p55s7O/FGBgK8AoXone2OxM=
=PG/w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--

