From phma@webjockey.net Sun Jan 19 08:02:56 2003
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 19 Jan 2003 16:02:56 -0000
Received: (qmail 82982 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2003 16:02:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 19 Jan 2003 16:02:56 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Jan 2003 16:02:55 -0000
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
  id 1B5884BBC; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 16:02:58 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: dis
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:02:57 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <200301191529.KAA21247@mail2.reutershealth.com>
In-Reply-To: <200301191529.KAA21247@mail2.reutershealth.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200301191102.57642.phma@webjockey.net>
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Sunday 19 January 2003 10:16, John Cowan wrote:
li'o
> To the second point, yes; that is how filling any place multiple times
> works. (Technically, the implied connective is jo'u, but we have not really
> figured out under what circumstances jo'u differs from .e).

vi vreta fa lo flapre .e lo stace nanmu: they can be the same person.
vi vreta fa lo flapre jo'u lo stace nanmu: they aren't.
vi vreta fa lo flapre je ke stace nanmu: they are.

phma