Subject: Re: [lojban] loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e

From: Pierre Abbat <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 11:02:57 -0500

On Sunday 19 January 2003 10:16, John Cowan wrote:
li'o
> To the second point, yes; that is how filling any place multiple times
> works. (Technically, the implied connective is jo'u, but we have not really
> figured out under what circumstances jo'u differs from .e).

vi vreta fa lo flapre .e lo stace nanmu: they can be the same person.
vi vreta fa lo flapre jo'u lo stace nanmu: they aren't.
vi vreta fa lo flapre je ke stace nanmu: they are.

phma