From lojbab@lojban.org Wed Jan 22 21:11:20 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 23 Jan 2003 05:11:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 55707 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 05:11:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2003 05:11:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lakemtao02.cox.net) (68.1.17.243) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 05:11:19 -0000 Received: from lojban.lojban.org ([68.100.206.153]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP id <20030123051117.IZQN6744.lakemtao02.cox.net@lojban.lojban.org> for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:11:17 -0500 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030123001050.034a3210@pop.east.cox.net> X-Sender: rlechevalier@pop.east.cox.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:11:44 -0500 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [lojban] za'e "postnex" In-Reply-To: <200301222255.15876.phma@webjockey.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed From: Robert LeChevalier X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1120595 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbab At 10:55 PM 1/22/03 -0500, you wrote: >On Wednesday 22 January 2003 22:41, And Rosta wrote: > > Not in Standard Lojban. But one has been proposed for Academic Lojban: > > > > http://www.lojban.org/wiki/index.php/Experimental%20anaphorics > > > > Your example would be: > > > > koi'a xi i bu zmadu li no zo'au ro da poi [i in N] > >Can we use {sezo'u}, which is currently ungrammatical, for this? It's ungrammatical, so "no". lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, President, The Logical Language Group, Inc. 2904 Beau Lane, Fairfax VA 22031-1303 USA 703-385-0273 Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org