From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jan 23 11:16:48 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 23 Jan 2003 19:16:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 4552 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 19:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2003 19:16:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 19:16:48 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18bmqG-0001dc-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:16:48 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18bmqA-0001dJ-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:16:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18bmq3-0001dA-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:16:35 -0800 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 11:16:35 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: loi preti be fi lo nincli zo'u tu'e Message-ID: <20030123191635.GB1942@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030119093824.0359cca0@pop.east.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030119093824.0359cca0@pop.east.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 3868 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 10:19:24AM -0500, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > At 01:33 PM 1/19/03 +0000, Martin Bays wrote: > >How to use functions with ranges beyond the numbers? E.g. if I have a > >function f:A->B with A and B sets {fy fancu abu noi selcmi ku'o by > >noi selcmi}, what's f(x)? According to jbofi'e, {ma'o fy boi xy} and > >{le ma'o fy boi xy} are both ungrammatical, and does {li ma'o fy boi > >xy} make sense? > > You're missing needed grammatical markers. Exactly which ones can be > elided and still work might take some experimentation, but > > vei ma'o fy boi xy works > the complete grammar of the above is > vei ma'o fy boi [te'u] xy [boi] [ku'e] [ve'o] I don't know what "vei ma'o fy boi xy" is, but it's *not* f(x), IMO. It could be (f(x)), but I don't know why one would do that. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi