From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jan 23 12:13:49 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 23 Jan 2003 20:13:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 38565 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2003 20:13:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2003 20:13:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jan 2003 20:13:48 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18bnjQ-0001vT-00
  for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:13:48 -0800
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
  by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
  id 18bnjH-0001v8-00; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:13:39 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:13:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05)
  id 18bnjA-0001uz-00
  for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:13:32 -0800
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 12:13:32 -0800
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: valfendi algorithm
Message-ID: <20030123201332.GA7230@digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org
References: <200301222303.45852.phma@webjockey.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200301222303.45852.phma@webjockey.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
X-archive-position: 3869
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:03:45PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> This is hopefully complete and correct, except for handling ZOI and
> FAhO, but has not been tested or proven. I have some partially written
> proofs but have to finish writing them.

Hoo-boy.

What, exactly, do the proofs demonstrate?

I hereby offer to attempt to debug any reasonably rigorous proof you
come up with.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin.
.i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu
.i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai
http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi




