From phma@webjockey.net Fri Jan 24 05:19:03 2003
Return-Path: <phma@ixazon.dynip.com>
X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 24 Jan 2003 13:19:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 1457 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 13:19:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Jan 2003 13:19:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO blackcat.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2003 13:19:02 -0000
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
  id F225CA4AA; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:19:01 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: dis
To: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>, lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: valfendi algorithm
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 08:19:01 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20030123201332.GA7230@digitalkingdom.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030124074752.0360aec0@pop.east.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030124074752.0360aec0@pop.east.cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200301240819.01200.phma@webjockey.net>
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300

On Friday 24 January 2003 07:56, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> This does not sound like it is a proper defining algorithm for the Lojban
> morphology as you've described it, and as a first glance at the text
> indicates. It may parse all well-formed Lojban words, but it also may
> successfully lex some not-well-formed Lojban (your algorithm seems to allow
> fu'ivla with embedded text strings that would invalidate the fu'ivla if it
> is a proper gismu or rafsi, but allows the fu'ivla if it is not). This is
> merely another stage in our long running dispute as to whether type IV
> fu'ivla are to be constrained to specific forms positively defined, or can
> consist of anything lexable word that could be a brivla that isn't a gismu
> or lujvo.

I am planning further versions which will check all words for well-formedness. 
Currently it accepts anything ending in a consonant and not containing a 
cmegadri as a cmene, including such unpronounceable messes as {mzantcesg}. 
What do you mean by "fu'ivla with embedded text strings that would invalidate 
the fu'ivla if it is a proper gismu or rafsi, but allows the fu'ivla if it is 
not"? Can you give an example?

phma

