From jcowan@reutershealth.com Fri Jan 24 07:09:15 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: jcowan@reutershealth.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 24 Jan 2003 15:09:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 31517 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 15:09:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Jan 2003 15:09:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail2.reutershealth.com) (65.246.141.151) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2003 15:09:14 -0000 Received: from skunk.reutershealth.com ([10.65.117.21]) by mail2.reutershealth.com (Pro-8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA23452 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:22:10 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200301241522.KAA23452@mail2.reutershealth.com> Received: by skunk.reutershealth.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:09:13 -0500 Subject: Re: [lojban] kybuso'i To: lojban@yahoogroups.com (Lojban List) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 10:09:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200301240807.33103.phma@webjockey.net> from "Pierre Abbat" at Jan 24, 2003 08:07:32 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Cowan X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=8122456 X-Yahoo-Profile: john_w_cowan Pierre Abbat scripsit: > One of the strings in my test data file is {kybusO'i}, [...] > That is, it is calling {ky} a cmavo and {buSO'i} invalid. Given {ky.busO'i} or > {kybu.sO'i}, it lexes three cmavo. Is this correct behavior? As Woldy says, bad things can happen if you don't follow a Cy cmavo with either another Cy cmavo or a pause. -- "Do I contradict myself? John Cowan Very well then, I contradict myself. jcowan@reutershealth.com I am large, I contain multitudes. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --Walt Whitman, _Leaves of Grass_ http://www.reutershealth.com